» Phoenix Plays Bloodhound with New FailSafe Product
Renown for its BIOS manufacturing, Phoenix takes a leap into the device management market with "command and control" system for laptop PCs.

» Rollout: Mac OS X Server 10.5 (Leopard)
New server OS is sleek, fast and business-ready—even for mixed environments.

» NECA 2008 Chicago Draws Record-Breaking Crowds

» Analysts slash 2009 PC growth forecast by two-thirds
One analyst firm has slashed its 2009 forecast for PC shipments by nearly two-thirds because of the deteriorating economy.

» Check Out the Latest Edition of ElectricTV.net
Catch the latest edition of ElectricTV, available at www.ElectricTV.net. You’ll see some of the highlights of ...

» 6 Skype Alternatives Offer New Services
In an effort to compete with the market leader, VoIP services such as GrandCentral and TalkBack have come up with some interesting and useful features that may inspire you to switch.

» NECA Applauds Extension Of Commercial Building Tax Deduction
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, signed into law on October 3, contains at least one beneficial provision that NECA and allies have been striving to attain — an extension of the Energy Efficient Commercial Building Tax Deduction which was set to expire at the end of this year. Under the new law, the deduction is available for qualified property placed in service after December 31, 2005, and prior to December 31, 2013.

» Outmoded BPM resources an issue for businesses

A recent study has found that organizations are showing a growing interest in BPM, but some are challenged by the lack of standards between process modeling and execution, amid other issues.

According to research by industry association AIIM of 354 end-users, 56 percent of respondents indicated they have implemented BPM projects ranging from departmental and cross-departmental to enterprisewide. The remaining 44 percent said they hadn't implemented a BPM project but plan to begin in the coming year.

[ Discover the top-rated IT products as rated by the InfoWorld Test Center. ]

Among the drivers behind this increased interest in BPM, said AIIM director Bob Larrivee, is the fact that advances in technology are allowing end-users capabilities like remote information access and "when you look at streamlining or automating business process in general it's becoming more and more of a driver that we need to do that, but also do it with some rules associated with it."

And applying business rules to an automated workflow will not only streamline the process, but will also automate decision-making, added Larrivee.

That said, many organizations remain "process ignorant" when it comes to BPM, said Larrivee, because "many still don't necessarily understand exactly how things are getting done [within the organization]." Moreover, he said organizations are relying on outdated documentation that exists on business processes.

Adoption aside, among the survey respondents who had implemented BPM technologies, some cited issues such as a lack of interchange standards between process modeling and execution tools, which can render system interoperability difficult, said Larrivee.

One reason that this issue exists, according to Mohammad Ketabchi, CEO and founder of Santa Clara, Calif.-based BPM vendor Savvion Inc., is that organizations are using modeling-only tools that lack an execution component. And even if they are able to import the model into an execution tool, "you will not be able to do a round-trip process improvement which is very, very important."

That round-trip process entails modeling, execution, monitoring, and improvement of the process again, explained Ketabchi.

But many organizations are using outmoded BPM tools that were developed before the Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) standard existed, noted Ketabchi.

Besides a lack of interchange standards, respondents also cited exception processing and interfaces as additional challenges.

Specifically, organizations have difficulty creating an ad hoc workflow process that can also be monitored. Michelle Warren, business consultant and technology analyst with MW Research and Consulting, said this particular challenge stems from the fact that BPM is "a series of processes that an organization must systematically work through." Implementing BPM takes time, said Warren, and is not a "one-install solution."

As for interfaces, organizations are finding the breadth of available BPM systems confusing in that each vendor interface will dictate how business processes are to be designed and applied. But "it will flesh itself out," said Warren, in that customers will decide which interface works best and by the end of approximately an 18-month time period, some vendors will adjust their business models to suit demand.

ComputerWorld Canada is an InfoWorld affiliate.